What Is Art?
Tuesday, February 27th, 2007Here I must confess that I find “organized sounds and silence” to be a bit limiting so far as the definition of music. Also I cannot call art “the experience of beauty,” because a tree that falls in a forest makes a sound no matter if anyone hears it or not.
Hung Up On Lyrics
Dyske Suematsu’s blog on Why Americans Don’t Like Jazz stirred up some comments on reddit. Suematsu argues that most Americans only listen to lyrics and cannot grasp the abstraction of melody. Someone on reddit commented that lyrics are the meaning of a song, and another that art has meaning or is otherwise inspired. Chiming in, I noted that many people seem to get hung up on the meaning of art just as they get hung up on the lyrics of music. There is more to music than lyrics, and there is more to art than meaning.
Hung Up On Meaning
If art does not need to be meaningful in order to be art, and it does not need to be inspired, skillfully authored, or framed in a museum, then what, pray tell, is art? Simply, art is everything, everywhere, all the time. What do I mean by that? Take one of my favorite quotes from John Cage: “Which is more musical: a truck passing by a factory, or a truck passing by a music school?”
People are afraid to accept this simplistic definition of art. They are afraid that it removes things which are great from their pedestals and throws them down into the mud with the mundane grind of daily existence. The reality is that if you can sensitize yourself to something as strange and unnatural as a band playing, then certainly you can become sensitive to the sounds around you every day, and further, every experience. (Consider how strange a band is: highly complex modern instruments producing otherworldly tones, parting the huge expanse of pitch possibilities into a narrowly distinct 12 divisions per octave.) Imagine the joy of life in appreciation of the art that surrounds you every day. However, art is not burdened with the weight of human experience. Art is still art, no matter if anyone experiences it or not.
The Artist’s Job
The artist’s job is simply to create. The artist need not interpret their own work; a philosopher may do that job. The artist may also simply draw people’s attention to the art which otherwise surrounds them. There can also be a meta-artist, who provides opportunities for other artists to create art (e.g., a jazz composer who writes for improvisation).
“Modern” Art
While it is true that art is often created by art historians for art historians, no one should fear modern, or post-modern (if you believe in such a thing) art. Aside from historical context, there is nothing to “get.” There are no secrets. If you like it, enjoy it; if not, move along.
People who have narrow views of what constitutes art probably do not spend a lot of time with their art. After you have seen one thousand portraits, portraits become less interesting. After you have seen one thousand still-lifes, still-lifes lose their edge. While the artist who can be creative within their historical context is thoroughly appreciated (see Cyrus Chestnut and Kevin Mahogany), after you have seen enough of one thing, you want to see something new and fresh. Photography freed artists from the need to merely record, and allowed more abstract creativity to take center stage.
What you see in a modern art gallery is simply the result of hundreds of years of people looking for something new and fresh, reacting to the art the came before them, and discovering life.
To Persuade Or To Inform
Though I hope this blog entry has informed you of my views regarding the definition of art, it is not my role to push my views upon you. Even if you do not agree with me, please ask yourself: what is art?
Humans choose and cultivate their sensitivities. You can develop sensitivity to absolutely anything. Why not choose to appreciate the beauty that surrounds you every day, all the time? If you enjoy listening to music, and every sound could be music, how happy would you be?

